Service copy

Project discipline

Project discipline

Define service copy responsibilities, inputs, collaborators and review outcomes. This page describes a discipline; staffing is agreed for each project.

Keep service copy requirements, inputs and acceptance evidence together. Explain completed work, open decisions and dependencies at each review.

Project collaboration / 11

Preparing the work

Inputs

Service copy: goals, existing material and constraints.

Work records

Record decisions, versions and unresolved questions.

Review

Check expectations using working pages or material.

Handover

Supply editable files, explanations and next actions.

Ownership

Agree the actual people and timing for each project.

Related practical notes

Connect different skills so content, visual design and implementation work towards the same project goal.

Choosing between Kentico Xperience and Kontent.ai

Practical notes

Choosing between Kentico Xperience and Kontent.ai

Compare authoring, preview, approval and release with the same update. Include frontend implementation and integration ownership in the evaluation.

Choosing between Kentico Xperience and Kontent.ai
OXOAK / Editorial

Practical notes

Practical notes

Kentico

Validate content, marketing and integrations together. Identify the product, version and editorial tasks before a migration prototype.

What is a composable DXP?

Practical notes

What is a composable DXP?

Map data flows between content, search, analytics and identity with failure owners. Replaceability requires real export and recovery paths.

What is a composable DXP?
OXOAK / Editorial

Practical notes

Practical notes

Where is my data anyway? Data sovereignty challenges in a world of SaaS and Cloud

Practical notes

Where is my data anyway? Data sovereignty challenges in a world of SaaS and Cloud

Inventory storage, backups, logs and support access across services and regions. Check contracts and settings rather than primary hosting location alone.

Where is my data anyway? Data sovereignty challenges in a world of SaaS and Cloud
OXOAK / Editorial

Practical notes

Practical notes

Kontent.ai

Validate structured reuse, visual previews, approval and cache updates across the content and frontend boundary.

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Optimizely

Practical notes

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Optimizely

Prototype the same content model, approval task and integration list on each platform. Separate licensing, implementation and operational costs rather than comparing feature-list length.

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Optimizely
OXOAK / Editorial

Practical notes

Practical notes

Optimizely

Assess content, experimentation and marketing separately, including defaults, audience rules and traceable results.

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Sitecore

Practical notes

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Sitecore

Compare editing, approval, multisite and integration using the same tasks. Platform names cannot replace project-fit validation.

Choosing a DXP: Kentico Xperience or Sitecore
OXOAK / Editorial

Practical notes

Practical notes

Sitecore

Identify the product and deployment model, then test editing, previews, permissions and external data.

Jamstack

Serve prebuilt pages statically and implement dynamic requests separately, with clear release, caching and private-data boundaries.